Mega Planning: A Primer

by rkaufman 29. November 2008 12:12

Mega Planning

Mega planning has a primary focus on adding value for all stakeholders, including society, for tomorrow’s child. It is realistic, practical, and ethical. It was initially developed by Roger Kaufman starting in the 1960s.

It relies on three basic foundations:

  1. A societal value-added “frame of mind” or paradigm:
    one’s world-view about any organization, people, and our shared communities and society. It focuses on an agreed-upon focus on adding value to all stakeholders.
  2. A shared determination and agreement on where to head and why:
    all people who can and might be impacted by the shared objectives must agree on purposes and results criteria, and
  3. Pragmatic and basic tools.
    Agreement and use of the tools of Mega Planning  provides the basic con­cepts for thinking and planning Mega in order to define and deliver value to all internal and external partners.

The Societal Value Added Perspective and Frame of Mind are unique and defining characteristics of Mega Planning

The required frame of mind for Mega thinking and planning, puts a pri­mary concern on adding measurable value for external clients and society using one’s own job and organization as the vehicle. From this shared societal value-added frame, everything one uses, does, produces, and delivers is linked to achieve shared and agreed-upon positive societal results: Mega level of planning.

A basic tenant is if you are not adding value to our shared society what assurance do you have that you are not subtracting value? Starting with Mega as the central focus is strategic thinking and provides the data base for strategic planning.

A central question that each and every organization is asked using Mega Planning is:

If Your Organization is the Solution, What’s the Problem? 

This fundamental proposition is central to thinking and planning strategically—using a Mega focus—represents a shift from the usual focus only on oneself, individual performance improvement, and one’s organization to making certain you also add value to external clients and society.

There are three basic guides, or templates, used to define and achieve organizational success:

 

More...

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , ,

Language of "Performance"

by rwatkins 23. October 2008 12:39
An insatiable focus on “performance” is often the defining characteristic of what most of us do, or profess to do, in both our professional and personal lives.    Yet, the words, terms, jargon, slang, lingo, acronyms, and other language of “performance” are often misinterpreted by those with differing backgrounds.  While we talk about “results”, they hear “processes”; while we talk about “ends”, they hear “means”; and while we talk about “performance”, they hear “performing”.  And somewhere among the many miscommunications that populate our interactions, the focus of our profession is somehow watered down, adulterated, diluted, weakened, or even worse… lost.

Does this mean that we are wrong to create a language that communicates readily within our profession but haphazardly beyond the boundaries of a few professional associations? Most likely not; after all, we use our professional language, like most professions do, as a practical means for clearly communicating the particulars of theories, tools, and techniques with others that have similar interests, backgrounds, and language.

But when we attempt use our specialized language at the fringes of our profession (for example, in conversations with professionals in human resources, organizational development, or industrial psychology that each have a language of their own that only modestly overlap with ours), numerous obstacles to successful performance improvement will typically form. This is not, however, unique to our profession or our language; just try to carry on a meaningful conversation with a tax attorney sometime. And when other professionals can benefit from your knowledge then they will “learn” your language very quickly.

But most of the language barriers present problems when we are in the position of wanting something from someone who speaks another language, and that means we have to overcome the obstacles created by the differences in language. For example, if you want technical information from a subject matter expert, then you will have to speak their language.  Or if you want a to perform a needs assessment within a firm of electrical engineers, then you will have to speak their language.

To overcome the many obstacles created by our differing professional languages, we typically apply three tactics: 

First, do your best to identify and learn the language of others with whom you will be working. If you are working with a group of priests, take time to learn at least a little of the language they will be using to communicate with you.

Second, use their language to define your language. Unlike a dictionary, we do not want use our own words to define our words.

Third, model your language carefully and religiously.  If you do not use your professional language accurately and consistently, then you can’t expect that it will communicate across professions with any necessary precision.

These three tactics for improving the clarity of your communications can be used in relation to many professional activities.  From talking with potential clients to planning for a successful needs assessment, work to communicate effectively with others about what performance is, what it is not, and how it can best be improved in order to accomplish valuable results for everyone.

The Assessment Book

by rkaufman 15. October 2008 10:22

The Assessment Book Instruments

The Assessment Book Cover

The Assessment Book includes seven self-assessment instruments—validated by professionals and organizations including IBM and Hewlett Packard—that provide solid guidance to calibrate where your organization is currently and help you decide where it should be.

These instruments address the issue of “what” before “how.” Whilst many professional surveys, books, guidelines, and support help available today are in the form of how-to approaches, research tells us that starting with implementation can often lead to consequences other than desirable results.


Seven Self-assessment Instruments

The seven self-assessment instruments provided below offer guides for you and your organization to define what results and consequences you want to deliver so that you may sensibly define the approaches, tools, and methods you should use to deliver success.

All instruments are available online for fast and effective implementation in your organization. Please click on the instrument titles for further information and to view a sample of the content.

  1. Strategic Thinking and Planning
  2. Needs Assessment
  3. Corporate Culture
  4. Evaluation
  5. Performance Improvement Competencies
  6. Performance Motivation
  7. Readiness for E-learning
Please contact us for more information about using these instruments in your organization.

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.4.5.0
Theme by Mads Kristensen